Next to oxygen would you believe, the latest trace gas on the block set to threaten the very existence of the planet, is about ready to hit the media bandwagon in the lead up to the UN's next climate-farce summit in Mexico City later this year. And it would be tragic if it weren’t so... well... laughable. Nitrous Oxide (N20), otherwise known as laughing gas (kind of like the earth's version of dopamine) is the latest climate saboteur to step up to the perennial pitchers plate. First they want us to forsake our meat, then our other relatively meagre comforts such as refrigerators, air conditioners, planes, trains and automobiles, and now it would appear laughter is on the no-no list. Nitrous oxide is created when ammonia is oxidized in the atmosphere. And the main cause of ammonia in the atmosphere, say the 'experts' (and haven't we had our fill of them?) is apparently increased livestock farming - farting friesians in other words. Their solution? Improved livestock farming techniques (in other words, total government control in anticipation of a time when food rationing will be necessary to control a wised-up populace) equating in the interim to escalated meat prices (big surprise). Alternatively (as we will be persuaded to embrace in order to 'save' the environment) we could all go vego and prop up our 'natural' diet with chemical supplements which will, as a consequence, cost us both and arm and a leg if not our lives. And then there is the bio fuels outrage, where hundreds of thousands of people starve to death for lack of food they need so that 'eco-friendly' consumers in the west can pour the product into cars they don't. Any idea how much CO2 and N20 contribute to the myth of anthropogenic climate change? Check HERE and be disturbed. Nitrous oxide, like CO2, far from being a climate threat, is essential to life on Earth. It [N2O] is in fact the main, naturally occurring regulator of stratospheric ozone. It is not a threat, it is part of the awesome mechanism the Lord has designed for the Earth to function.
If one were to only look beyond the veil so artfully hung by the interests and their agendas, and promoted surreptitiously through their socialist propaganda mills, one would clearly see the whole climate change con as simply a stock market for the heavily invested 'rescue' companies with their snake oil solutions for problems that simply do not exist. Ladies and gentlemen, Anthropogenic Climate Change is gearing up to be the largest, most bodacious display of wholesale global treason and what will inevitably prove to be the greatest sting of the 21st Century. Perhaps for this reason alone it is imperative that we remember the players involved, for surely the time of both their accountability and retribution is imminent. Do you hear that Mister Rudd? Mz Wong? Peter (don't give up your day job) Garrett, and all the other influential, empethetic others? Imminent!
The following series of reports reflect the latest in the whole climate change debacle. Please feel free to forward these reports to your family, friends and associates.
As man-made climate fears subside and the scientific, economic, cultural and political case evaporates for climate change "action," expect more and more green activists to take up the mantle for "laughing gas" as a possible replacement eco-scare.
See also: Laughing Gas Knocks Out CO2 - By Doug Hoffman - Oct. 30, 2009 - Excerpt: "In the face of ever mounting evidence that CO2 is incapable of causing the level of global devastation prophesied by climate change catastrophists a new villain is being sought. The leading candidate is nitrous oxide (N2O), better known as laughing gas. A report in Science claims that N2O emissions are currently the single most important cause of ozone depletion and are expected to remain so throughout the 21st century. The IPCC rates N2O as 310 times as potent a greenhouse gas as CO2 on a 100 year time scale. Is this a greenhouse gas bait and switch, or are the global warming alarmists trying to up the ante."
Still can't picture former Vice President Al Gore touting the "laughing gas" crisis as the "moral" challenge of our time in a Oscar-winning documentary? Not to worry, there are many more eco-scares currently being test-marketed.
Gore's own producer of "An Inconvenient Truth" -- Hollywood eco-activist Laurie David -- is already test-marketing another eco-scare with potential promise.
"One Word: Plastics." Yes, just 43 years after the 1967 film "The Graduate", "plastics" just may be the future!
"The rapid rise in global plastic production is leading to a rise in plastic pollution and its devastating effects on our oceans and our lives.," Laurie David wrote on July 31, 2009. Selected Excerpts From David's blog post: "This insidious invasion of the biosphere by our plastic waste is in some ways more alarming for us humans than global warming. Our bodies have evolved to handle carbon dioxide, the nemesis of global warming, indeed, we exhale it with every breath. Plastic, though present in the biosphere from the nano scale on up, is too stable a molecule for any organism to fully assimilate or biodegrade. So we have a situation in which a vector for a suite of devastating chemicals, chemicals implicated in many modern diseases, is now invading the ocean, our bodies and indeed, the entire biosphere. The prognosis for improvement in this situation is grim."
Still not convinced of either "laughing gas" or "plastics" as the next dominant eco-scare? Don't worry, we are just getting started.
Just how widespread is the test marketing of a new eco-scare to replace the flailing global warming movement?
It now has the attention of the beleaguered head of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Rajendra Pachauri.
Pachauri wrote on November 23, 2009: "The question is whether the additional time that the world would now have to arrive at an agreement at the next Conference of the Parties in Mexico will give us time and space to look at the larger problem of unsustainable development, of which climate change is at best a symptom. Human society cannot continue to ignore the vital dependence that exists between human welfare and the health of our natural resources."
Excerpt: "In the view of Professor Ervin Laszlo, the drop in atmospheric oxygen has potentially serious consequences. A UN advisor who has been a professor of philosophy and systems sciences, Laszlo writes: Evidence from prehistoric times indicates that the oxygen content of pristine nature was above the 21% of total volume that it is today. It has decreased in recent times due mainly to the burning of coal in the middle of the last century. Currently the oxygen content of the Earth's atmosphere dips to 19% over impacted areas, and it is down to 12 to 17% over the major cities. At these levels it is difficult for people to get sufficient oxygen to maintain bodily health: it takes a proper intake of oxygen to keep body cells and organs, and the entire immune system, functioning at full efficiency. At the levels we have reached today cancers and other degenerative diseases are likely to develop. And at 6 to 7% life can no longer be sustained."
Wow. Imagine scaring school children with suffocation due to our modern way of life! Documentaries, text books and Hollywood could really instill fear in the kids and adults with scary predictions of Mom and Dad choking to death due to a lack of oxygen created by evil modern society. Mom and Dad turning blue and suffering fatal convulsions sure beats the emotional imagery of a Polar Bear drowning or a building be flooded to due to rising seas. Keep your eye on this one, it just may get some traction.
Ok. Let's assume now that one of the above or yet another not ready for prime time eco-fear catches on, how would the environmental activists go about selling this eco-scare to the public?
For an answer, let's review a few of the failed eco-alarms of the past 40 years.
Ever wonder how Gore and the UN would hype a "tipping point" for various new eco-scares? Newsweek Magazine first used the climate “tipping point” argument in 1975 to urge action to prevent man-made global cooling. Newsweek wrote April 28, 1975 article: "The longer the planners delay, the more difficult will they find it to cope with climatic change once the results become grim reality."
The allegedly disappearing rainforest scare was the environmental issue du jour in the 1980's and 1990's, long before climate fears took center stage. In fact, In 2000, Climate Depot's Executive Editor Marc Morano was producer and correspondent for a documentary debunking the myths about the rainforests. Morano's "Amazon Rainforest: Clear-Cutting the Myths" was greeted with massive controversy. But, just nine years later, the rainforest scare was kaput.
NYT Excerpt: Here, and in other tropical countries around the world, small holdings like Ms. Ortega de Wing's - and much larger swaths of farmland - are reverting back to nature, as people abandon their land and move to the cities in search of better livings. These new "secondary" forests are emerging in Latin America, Asia and other tropical regions at such a fast pace that the trend has set off a serious debate about whether saving primeval rain forest - an iconic environmental cause - may be less urgent than once thought. By one estimate, for every acre of rain forest cut down each year, more than 50 acres of new forest are growing in the tropics on land that was once farmed, logged or ravaged by natural disaster. "There is far more forest here than there was 30 years ago," said Ms. Ortega de Wing, 64, who remembers fields of mango trees and banana plants.
Other eco-scares that did not pan out include the 1970's and 1980's baseless scares about resource scarcity and predictions of famine. (Excerpt: The ultimate embarrassment for the Malthusians was when Paul Ehrlich bet Julian Simon $1,000 in 1980 that five resources (of Ehrlich's choosing) would be more expensive in 10 years. Ehrlich lost: 10 years later every one of the resources had declined in price by an average of 40 percent.) Plus other eco-scares like "ocean acidification" and others too numerous to mention.
Already we have some of the most insulting attempts to shift the focus away from the "warming" aspect of "global warming."
Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) -- in true "Climate Astrology" fashion -- dismissed the lack of global warming on March 4, 2009 by declaring: “Climate change is not just about temperatures going up. It's also about volatility."
Lest there be any doubt that desperation time has set in for the promoters of man-made climate fears, Schelling removed it.
Schelling continued: “I sometimes wish that we could have, over the next five or ten years, a lot of horrid things happening -- you know, like tornadoes in the Midwest and so forth -- that would get people very concerned about climate change.”
Let's get this straight. A prominent promoter of man-made global warming is now openly wishing for death and destruction of Americans in order to convince them that man-made global warming is a threat?
Climate Depot encourages Schelling and Sen. Stabenow to continue their utter climate silliness.
Well actually, in the end God rules the day and He must be shaking his head witnessing all of this reprehensible skullduggery. Climate ''Sceptics'' experienced a brief moment of parted cloud when capitulator Malcolm Turnbull, former leader of what we are told is the 'opposition' party, was replaced with one whose convictions apparently support some of our own - specifically that Anthropogenic climate change is little more than a symposium of political hot air. But that brief respite was quickly disturbed by the revelation that new ''opposition'' leader Tony Abbott may merely be the failsafe should Rudd lose government at the next election where the elitists plans and policies for Australia, will be successfully introduced through one who will woo over the sceptics - or so they think. Tony Abbott is a devout Catholic, and yes I do have a problem with that when associating it with anything Christian. What troubles me more however, is the fact that Abbott is a Rhodes scholar, and Rhodes scholars are committed to global government. Even more disturbing than that is the fact that Tony Abbott calls upon, as his inspiration, a man who frankly should be locked in a padded cell for the unbelievable evil he imagines. That man is Prince Philip, one whose name is increasingly becoming associated with catastrophic genocide. And I don't know exactly why, but when I look at Prince William on the TV I get creeped out. Whenever anyone gets worldly acclaim as unto worship all the warning lights go on. The world is looking for a leader, one to steer it out of the mess it has found itself in. He will be a statesman, universally loved and admired, will be visually appealing because after all humans are completely and irretrievably vain. He will be charming, diplomatic and all embracing. He will be like the very kind of king the Israelites saw in Saul, strong by earthly virtues, but void of what it takes to truly be a king. Let's just say that as far as Prince William is concerned... we're looking closely at his 15 minutes of fame playing out before our very eyes.
The following media release from the Citizens Electoral Council of Australia is stark and to the point. Please pay close attention to what is being said...
Citizens Electoral Council of Australia
Media Release 19th of January 2010
Craig Isherwood‚ National Secretary
Abbott Joins Prince Philip's Green Genocide Army
Opportunist Opposition leader Tony Abbott has named the man who aspires to be the world's biggest mass murderer‚ Prince Philip‚ as his inspiration for his recent embrace of greenie policies‚ including his plan to complete the Howard government initiated shut down of the Murray Darling Basin‚ and to draft 15‚000 Australians into a sub minimum wage "green" army. Prince Philip and former Nazi SS officer Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands co founded the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) in 1961 to reduce human population; the WWF has raised enormous sums of money from multinational corporations like BP‚ Shell‚ Rio Tinto‚ and Unilever to lock up great tracts of land, first in Africa, and then all over the world‚ so that the land could not be used by locals for the kind of economic development they required to raise their living standards.
Prince Philip fantasised aloud about population reduction in August 1988‚ telling Deutsche Presse Agentur‚ "In the event that I am reincarnated‚ I would like to return as a deadly virus‚ in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation."
Tony Abbott told ABC radio on 16th December that his idea that there was a natural fit between the conservation movement and "conservative" politics was inspired by "no less a person than Prince Philip" being the "inaugural president or patron at one of the big international environmental organisations [sic]."
Citizens Electoral Council leader Craig Isherwood today blasted Abbott for his promotion of green genocide:
"Tony Abbott's declared intention is to continue Prince Philip's greenie destruction of Australia‚" Mr Isherwood said.
"The Murray Darling Basin is Australia's food bowl‚ and green genocidalists like Tim Flannery and the other quacks in Prince Philip's WWF funded 'Wentworth Group' of scientists have peddled lies about global warming and 'permanent drought' to shut it down-because it is the nation's food bowl.
"Abbott's fellow Royal sycophant John Howard began the destruction of the Basin‚ by squashing options like the Clarence River Scheme to increase the volume of available water‚ and instead initiating water trading and buy backs designed to drive farms out of production-that's what Abbott intends to complete."
The CEC National Secretary warned people not to be fooled by Abbott's opposition to the Emissions Trading Scheme last year‚ which was opportunistic‚ and in fact forced on him by the shift in public opinion against climate change policies.
The truth‚ he said‚ is that the supposedly devout Catholic's support of environmentalism fails a fundamental moral test:
"You can't be for the common good of humanity‚ and support Prince Philip's green genocide‚" he insisted.
"Humanity's future is at stake: green policies have been used by the British oligarchy to deindustrialise nations and smash their agricultural production‚ which has left the world with a worsening food shortage.
"To shut down Australia's food bowl at this time‚ is criminal and immoral."
Mr Isherwood concluded‚ "The good news is that the mass opposition of Australians forced Abbott into line and defeated the ETS in December‚ so I call on all Australians to work with the CEC to crush green genocide once and for all."
When Australians finally wake up to what is being foisted upon them by desperately dishonest people masquerading as those who care for the 'environment', there will be an uprising so large so as to demand the dethronement of the very monarchy that has perpetuated this great green lie and treated its colonial subjects with such unbelievable contempt. There are many players in this evil game, five of whom are listed below. Take particular note of the fact that each and every one of these players has a clear and vested interest in seeing climate policy changed. Again, take note of the fact that each and every one of these players stands to make more money than most of us can possibly comprehend out of something that is simply a lie. Barbara Hollingworth is a reporter for the Washington Examiner. In her report below she lists five of the most prominent characters in this great swindle. We would like to add more players beginning with these three deceivers...
Kevin Rudd: - Prime Minister of Australia
Penny Wong: 'Çlimate Change' Minister
Peter Garrett: 'Environment Minister
We should probably add these two as well, the latter cautiously...
In 1912, a respected paleontologist at the British Museum confirmed that bones found in a Piltdown quarry came from the "missing link" between apes and humans. Forty years later, the so-called Piltdown Man was proved to be a hoax. Thanks to purloined e-mails from the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit (CRU), global warming is turning out to be the 21st-century equivalent of Piltdown Man.
E-mails between a small group of highly influential climate scientists at the center of the worldwide panic over global warming exposed multiple discussions among them concerning their manipulation of data and using various evasive tactics to avoid releasing the facts behind their ginned-up numbers to the public via Freedom of Information Act requests.
Here's a rogue's gallery of five major perpetrators of what's turning out to be the biggest scientific hoax in modern history:
Geoff Jenkins, chairman of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's first scientific group and self-described "frontman explaining climate change." Jenkins admitted in 1996 to a "cunning plan" to feed fake temperature information to Nick Nuttall, head of media for the United Nations Environment program. At the time, Jenkins predicted temperatures in London would hit 113 degrees Fahrenheit and the Thames River would rise three feet even though 1996 was, in fact, cooler than 1995.
Phil Jones, director of the CRU, controlled two key databases that are the primary sources underlying claims by the United Nations and others of a global scientific "consensus" that catastrophic consequences will result from man-made global warming unless trillions of dollars are spent now to prevent it.
Jones e-mailed instructions to colleagues to "hide the decline" in temperatures and to pressure editors of academic journals to blackball the work of "climate skeptics."
After claiming that the original climate data had been destroyed in the 1980s, Jones was caught urging his CRU colleagues to "delete as appropriate" data requested under Britain's freedom of information laws.
Michael Mann, director of Penn State University's Earth System Science Center, is one of the lead authors of the U.N.'s Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change report. Mann was the originator of the "hockey stick" graph that supposedly proved that the Earth's temperature was at the highest level in recorded history. However, it also appeared to eliminate both the Medieval Warm Period, in which surface temperatures were higher than they are today, and Europe's "Little Ice Age."
In 2003, Canadian statistician Steve McIntyre exposed the flawed methodology behind Mann's hockey stick. The recent e-mail leak led another scientist to quip: "Dr. Mann is in transition from Penn State to State Pen. We can only hope he does a better job with license plates."
Mann has been a committee chairman for the National Academy of Sciences and a member of multiple NAS panels and committees.
James Hansen, head of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, whose records were also cited as evidence, second only to the CRU data, of incontrovertible man-made global warming. McIntyre also caught Hansen engaging in the same sort of statistical manipulation in which past temperatures were lowered and recent ones "adjusted" to convey the false impression that the nonexistent warming trend was accelerating. After trying to block McIntyre's IP address, NASA was forced to back down from its claim that 1998 was the hottest year in U.S. history.
Al Gore, Former Vice President Al Gore is the author of "An Inconvenient Truth," star of the 2006 Oscar-winning movie of the same name and winner of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for his tireless efforts to limit economic development in industrialized countries with a cap-and-trade scheme. Many experts agree that such a system would increase food and energy prices, while wasting trillions of dollars on alternative energy sources (in which Gore is heavily invested). Gore's case rests on the now-discredited theory that carbon dioxide emissions (which are increasing) are heating up the Earth's atmosphere, even though actual global temperatures have been declining for at least a decade.
These five, though far from being the only ones, are among the top perpetrators of the Great Global Warming Hoax. They should never be taken seriously again.
Barbara F. Hollingsworth is The Examiner's local opinion editor.
The stakes are high, high enough for this thing to not go away. It may well morph from one thing to another but it will always remain because of the stakes. And it may well piggyback itself into law on the back of some innocuous, unrelated bill to which few are paying attention. But be introduced in one form or another it will. And we, as believers in the risen Messiah, know well that Satan will have his end time kingdom - albeit for just 3 1/2 years. We know it will be a kingdom constructed on lies, falsehoods and lusts. The Word declares so that we should not be surprised, that at the end of days (namely those in which we now live) evil men and deceivers will grow worse, not better! So we can expect the lies and the cons and the swindles and the extortions and the unbelievable arrogance with which they are administered, to increase, and to increase at lunatic proportions. As a deceived creation returns to its pagan worship and golden calves the truly redeemed need to have their eyes and hearts heavenward and to separate themselves from compromised fellowships more intent with being friends with the world than obedient to God. To separate themselves from fellowships that engage in goddess worship, fellowships such as those who observe earth hour - which is nothing more or nothing less than a love offering to Gaia - fellowships such as Hillsong Australia, proud supporters of earth hour. Notice the date of their media release and that of our report on the same.
Trust not in the government of man, trust rather in the coming King - Yahshua the Messiah.